Factors that Impact Decision-Making Responsibility/Parenting Time of Children
Decisions regarding decision-making responsibility and parenting time are made with a view only to the best interests of the child. Both the Children’s Law Reform Act and the Divorce Act set out an enumerated list of factors that are to be considered when making decisions regarding decision-making responsibility and parenting time.
If you and your partner were either never married or were married but have decided to separate rather than divorce, the Children’s Law Reform Act will govern your matter and parenting will be expressed in terms of decision-making responsibility and parenting time.
Section 24(3) of the Children’s Law Reform Act sets out a number of factors to consider when making decisions regarding decision-making responsibility and parenting time including;
- The child’s needs, given the child’s age and stage of development, such as the child’s need for stability;
- The nature and strength of the child’s relationship with each parent, each of the child’s siblings and grandparents and any other person who plays an important role in the child’s life;
- Each parent’s willingness to support the development and maintenance of the child’s relationship with the other parent;
- The history of care of the child;
- The child’s views and preferences, giving due weight to the child’s age and maturity, unless they cannot be ascertained;
- The child’s cultural, linguistic, religious and spiritual upbringing and heritage, including Indigenous upbringing and heritage;
- Any plans for the child’s care;
- The ability and willingness of each person in respect of whom the order would apply to care for and meet the needs of the child;
- The ability and willingness of each person in respect of whom the order would apply to communicate and co-operate, in particular with one another, on matters affecting the child;
- Any family violence and its impact on,
- The ability and willingness of any person who engaged in the family violence to care for and meet the needs of the child, and the appropriateness of making an order that would require persons in respect of whom the order would apply to co-operate on issues affecting the chid; and any civil or criminal proceeding, order, condition or measure that is relevant to the safety, security and well-being of the child.
If you and your partner were already married and have either divorced or are pursuing a divorce, the Divorce Act will govern your matter and parenting will be expressed in terms of decision-making responsibility and parenting time.
Section 16(3) of the Divorce Act now also includes a list of factors the court will consider in making decisions regarding decision-making responsibility and parenting time including;
- The child’s needs, given the child’s age and stage of development, such as the child’s need for stability;
- The nature and strength of the child’s relationship with each spouse, each of the child’s siblings and grandparents and any other person who plays an important role in the child’s life;
- Each spouse’s willingness to support the development and maintenance of the child’s relationship with the other spouse;
- The history of the care of the child;
- The child’s views and preferences, giving due weight to the child’s age and maturity, unless they cannot be ascertained;
- The child’s cultural, linguistic, religious and spiritual upbringing and heritage, including Indigenous upbringing and heritage;
- Any plans for the child’s care;
- The ability and willingness of each person in respect of whom the order would apply to care for and meet the needs of the child;
- The ability and willingness of each person in respect of whom the order would apply to communicate and cooperate, in particular with one another, on matters affecting the child;
- Any family violence and its impact on, among other things,
- The ability and willingness of any person who engaged in the family violence to care for and meet the needs of the child, and
- The appropriateness of making an order that would require persons in respect of whom the order would apply to cooperate on issues affecting the child; and
- Any civil or criminal proceeding, order, condition, or measure that is relevant to the safety, security and well-being of the child
A parent’s past conduct is not relevant in a determination of decision-making responsibility/parenting time unless that past conduct is relevant to their ability to act as a parent or to exercise their parenting time or decision-making responsibility.
However, there is an exception to this general rule that past conduct will not be considered: family violence or abuse. Under both the Children’s Law Reform Act and the Divorce Act, any history of family violence or abuse will be considered in making a decision regarding decision-making responsibility and parenting time.
Simply having an affair will not, alone, be grounds for an individual to lose decision-making responsibility and parenting time. However, there may be other factors that are related to this affair that may impact the individual’s ability to act as a parent, that may impact a decision-making responsibility or parenting order.
While courts may place more emphasis on certain factors rather than others, what is important to remember is that courts will always have a view towards the best interests of the children involved.
Meet Our Dedicated Team of Lawyers
Over a Century of Collective Experience
-
Andrew Feldstein Founder
Andrew Feldstein graduated from Osgoode Hall Law School in 1992. Prior to focusing exclusively on family law, Andrew’s legal practice covered many different areas, including corporate commercial. One of Andrew’s fundamental objectives is to achieve those goals mutually and collaboratively, as set out by him and his client.
-
Daphna Schwartz Lawyer
Daphna Schwartz joined Feldstein Family Law Group, P.C. in 2007 as an associate lawyer. She was previously practising family law in the Barrie area. Her practice includes all areas of divorce and family law, including custody and access, child support, spousal support, and property issues. Daphna is also qualified to practise Collaborative Family Law.
-
Anna Troitschanski Lawyer
Anna Troitschanski joined the team at Feldstein Family Law Group, P.C. in 2012. Prior to that, she practised Family Law at a boutique Newmarket firm. Her experience covers all areas of divorce and family law, including custody and access, child support, spousal support, and division of property.
-
Nick Slinko Lawyer
Nick Slinko attended York University from 2003 until 2007 where he majored in both Law & Society and Philosophy. Nick graduated in 2007 with an Honours Bachelor of Arts degree. He proceeded to earn a Juris Doctor in Law at the University of Western Ontario in 2011. Nick was Called to the Bar in June of 2012 after completing his Articling term with the Feldstein Family Law Group, P.C. He became an associate with the firm immediately thereafter.
-
Veronica Yeung Lawyer
Veronica Yeung joined the Feldstein Family Law Group, P.C. as a summer student in 2014 and returned as an articling student in 2015. Following her call to the Ontario Bar in June 2016, Veronica was welcomed to the team as an associate lawyer.
Veronica attended York University for her undergraduate studies and graduated as a member of the Dean’s Honour Roll when she obtained her Bachelor’s degree in Honours Criminology.
-
Shana Gordon-Katz Lawyer
Shana joined Feldstein Family Law Group P.C. as an articling student in 2017. Following her call to the Ontario Bar in June 2018, Shana was welcomed back to the firm as an associate. While completing her articles, Shana assisted with legal matters covering all areas of family law.
Shana attended the University of Western Ontario for her undergraduate studies, where she graduated as the gold medalist of her program, Honors Specialization in Classical Studies.
-
Rachel Zweig Lawyer
Rachel joined Feldstein Family Law Group P.C as a Summer Student in 2019 and returned as an Articling Student in 2020-2021. Following her Call to the Ontario Bar in April 2021, Rachel was welcomed back to the firm as an Associate.
Prior to completing her legal studies and obtaining her Juris Doctor at the University of Ottawa, Rachel obtained her Bachelor’s Degree at Ryerson University with a major in English Literature.
-
Lauren Harvey Associate Lawyer
Lauren joined Feldstein Family Law Group as a Summer Student in 2020 and returned as an Articling Student in 2021-2022. Following her Call to the Ontario Bar in April 2022, Lauren was welcomed back to the firm as an Associate.
Prior to completing her legal studies and obtaining her Juris Doctor at the University of Western Ontario, Lauren obtained her Honour’s Bachelor of Arts Degree at Wilfrid Laurier University majoring in Criminology and minoring in Law and Society.
-
Quinn Held Associate Lawyer
Quinn spent two years as a Summer Student and then completed her Articling term at a boutique Family Law firm in Orangeville, where she was exposed to various complex Family Law matters. Following her Call to the Bar of Ontario in June 2022, she became an Associate with the Feldstein Family Law Group.
Prior to obtaining her Juris Doctor from the University of Windsor, Quinn obtained her Honour’s Bachelor of Arts Degree at the University of Guelph majoring in Criminal Justice and Public Policy and minoring in International Development.
-
Kyla Johnson Associate Lawyer
Kyla is an approachable, understanding, and motivated advocate. This enables her to build strong relationships with clients. Her practice includes all areas of family law including parenting time, decision-making responsibility, child support, spousal support, division of property and divorce.